• This provision is to the effect that when the Articles are registered there comes into being a contract between the company on one hand and shareholders on the other to observe the provisions of the articles.
• Either party is free to sue the other for non compliance with the provisions of the articles. Welton V. Sattery.
• Hickman V. Kent or Romney Mash Sheep Breeders Association
• The company and its members have rights and subject to obligations.
• Rights conferred by the contract are only enforceable by members qua members ElleyV. Positive Government Life Assurance Co., Beattie V. Beattie.
• The contract is unenforceable by an outsider.
• The contract is subject to the memorandum and provisions of the Companies Act.
• The terms of the contract keep on changing from time to time as and when the company alters the Articles.
• Courts have observes in Obiter that a second contract is created between each member and every other i.e. members inter se.
• The decision in Wood V. Odessa Water Works and Quin and Axtens Ltd. V. Salmon are cited for this argument.