• This problem is based on breach of duty directors. In this case it is apparent that Daudi is guilty of breach of duty to the company. His conduct is fraudulent in character and the company is entitled to damages since the general meeting of the company has ratified the abuse of power Jane Wangokho and other aggrieved members have the right to institute a derivative action against Daudi for the misfeasance. The action is representative in character. My advise is based on the exceptions to the rule in Foss V.Harbottle which facilitate a derivative action against fraudsters if the company cannot itself institute proceedings.
(Visited 6 times, 1 visits today)